[Tagging] It seems that opening_hours:covid19=* tag is a bad idea, right?

[Peter Elderson]

I think this kind of data should have a mandatory expiry/renewal date!

Peter Elderson


Op di 15 feb. 2022 om 12:58 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> Am Di., 15. Feb. 2022 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com
> >:
>
>> Le 15.02.22 à 00:18, António Madeira a écrit :
>> > Just to remember one of the good practices of OSM:
>> >
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
>>
>> "it should at least be expected to remain unchanged in the next few weeks"
>> I don't know about you, but where I come from, decisions to change the
>> schedule due to covid constraints fit perfectly into this framework,
>> when they are taken, no one in their right mind expects them to last
>> only a few hours nor days
>
>
>
> indeed. From various discussions I also took away that this particular
> rule is not an absolute rule in terms of time, according to the area and
> the contributors, it is often accepted that people who commit to checking
> back frequently, in their "active area", may add rather short-term changes
> (not talking about hours or few days) because they "guarantee" that it will
> be updated as soon as it changes.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220215/75c9353f/attachment.htm>