[Tagging] Deprecating phone=* in favor of more ambiguity in the database

[LeTopographeFou]

Martin,

I'm not in this author's mind but took it as a mistake and/or bad 
choosen words or a syntax error (saying that the phone tag brings more 
ambiguity to him) when I read it. Past and existing discussion was clear 
that the intent was to merge two tagging schemes into one, even if the 
modification proposed did not won approval. So I concluded that the 
title (and first sentence which was copy-pasted) was to be ignored. 
Which is terrible because with such a hot topic he lost the few 
attention that some were ready to give him, summarizing his long 
proposal to the exact opposite of what he wanted to achieve. And then he 
was banned with no opportunity to explain if it was an error (as I think 
so) or a provocation.

LeTopographeFou

Le 14/02/2022 à 09:13, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 14 Feb 2022, at 01:21, stevea<steveaOSM at softworkers.com>  wrote:
>>
>> So, maybe there needs to be a great project, call it Project Afterburner.  It would recycle the hot air of endless, goes-nowhere discussion, like here,
>
> what could you expect from a thread that according to its title is about deprecation in favor of more ambiguity?
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220216/9380baff/attachment.htm>