[Tagging] Time to split the list?

[Warin]

On 18/2/22 08:53, Peter Elderson wrote:
> Dian Ågesson <me at diacritic.xyz>:
>
>     I have found it very difficult to keep track of the conversations
>     on this list. I have seen suggestions or questions crowded out by
>     ongoing, broad discussions. I’ve seen a lot of words about
>     theories and philosophies that don’t really relate to a specific tag
>
>     ...
>
>     Splitting the audience by purpose would allow more nuanced
>     conversations to take place in parallel to “routine” tagging
>     enquiries. With less overwhelming lists, more editors would be
>     inclined to sign up (or at least not unsubscribe).
>
>     I’m happy to be told this is a bad idea, but I think it may help
>     people communicate better. Rather than competing for airtime in a
>     noisy room, people can have time to breathe.
>
> I recognize the problem, but a split is not the solution.

+1


Proposals can go in many directions ... and having them on a separate 
list may lead to even less people looking at them.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220218/f03e2c37/attachment-0001.htm>