[Tagging] Consensus switching away from mailinglists? Was: Time to split the list?
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Feb 19 10:34:11 UTC 2022
We can do it anyway, there are various exemptions for copyright and I believe
that such service can be made in way that it would qualify for at least some.
Note: I am not a lawyer, I may be very mistaken.
Feb 19, 2022, 00:21 by bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com:
> I wish there was a conditions under the terms of service that would
> require posters to license their comments under a copyleft license
> like CC BY-SA 3.0+. Then we could just archive (and then incrementally
> sync) the whole mailing list on some git forge that has search built
> in. It would also allow deletion or correcting typos in posts.
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:51 PM Brian M. Sperlongano
> <zelonewolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Chiming in with my shell script for bulk downloading from the mailing list archives:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Searching_mailing_lists
>>
>> Still inconvenient but will get you there with some grep action.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 5:44 PM bkil <bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Note that mailman3 has an archiver with a search engine named
>>> Hyperkitty built in - it's just an upgrade away.
>>> https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/hyperkitty/en/latest/
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:28 PM Zeke Farwell <ezekielf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 5:18 PM Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Any reasonably competent search engine will take site:lists.openstreetmap.org as a term to search just the mailing lists.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 6:46 AM Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> ... type of discussions which would really benefit from being easily searchable - not one of Mailman's great strengths, particularly since Google has stopped indexing a lot of mailing list content. It's really hard to find old OSM discussions these days - Google just doesn't index them - and that impacts the tagging@ list more than others.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Tagging mailing list
>>> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220219/fce25b1a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list