[Tagging] Clarification on the role link in route relations

[Adam Franco]

>
> If they 'lack support' for the route role, how can it  causes problems'
>
for them?
>

The problem is that the link role is a bit of a troll-tagging situation.
Route-membership generally means "this way is part of a route", but it
sounds like the link role means "this way isn't part of *the* route, though
it is associated with the route".

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220108/5d7962ea/attachment.htm>