[Tagging] Clarification on the role link in route relations

[Dave F]

On 13/01/2022 18:30, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:16 PM Dave F via Tagging 
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>     I'm intrigued by your Point 3.
>     Please provide a link to it in OSM & details of your rendering
>     (Github,
>     website?).
>
>     DaveF
>
>
> The example is in the github link that Minh provided:
> https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana/issues/79

Thanks for that, but it provides no info about this new rendering. You 
mentioned Opentilemaps. Is that what they're using?

As this is a map image I'm still unsure how it's related to routing 
software.

>
> I've just added a couple comments describing the possible technical 
> solutions to this issue as well at the link one of the objects in 
> question on the map, which I'll also paste here:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587338079

Cheers. That way is an 'exit from', not a 'link to' so it shouldn't be a 
member of the VT 15 relation. The roads heading to the V 15 should be 
included with link roles.

However, this is a developer, not OSM database problem. They should have 
filter rules to remove any data they're not interested in.

Your Point 3 - When you say 'Remove relation |link| memberships from the 
map' do you mean from their  rendering or OSM database? If the latter, I 
disagree.

DaveF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220113/4943fabd/attachment-0001.htm>