[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - window:shape

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

HI,

as far as I know f4map doesn't render windows and osmbuildings have
given up rendering newly mapped things. So, in my opinion, 3D mapping
doesn't have the highest priority at the moment. However, I don't mind
putting as much information as possible into the map for future uses.
The question of single, double or triple glazed surely has someone
interested in it, from an environmental perspective maybe.

Church windows are a completely different can of worms, because not
every church denomination allows for stained-glass windows; I don't
think Methodists or Quakers have them.

Anne

On 15/01/2022 09:04, bkil wrote:
> Well, for the purpose of rendering in a 3D meta-world, the difference
> between a double-glazed and triple-glazed window would probably not be
> visible. Although, now that you mention it, what about decorative
> windows in places of worship that are made out of small color tiles?
> Surely there's colour=* for plain tinted windows.
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:57 AM Anne-Karoline Distel
> <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:
>> I've been thinking about the panes. They belong in this proposal, but as
>> regards to abandoned buildings, it would be interesting to tag whether
>> they still have window panes or whether the windows are boarded up with
>> plywood or metal. Also, in an abandoned (or any building), it just takes
>> one stone throw and you'd have to change the tagging. For "in-use"
>> buildings, the default would be glass, of course, but would you want
>> double-glazed and triple-glazed to be tagged different? For ruins, the
>> default would be "no glass", of course.
>>
>> Anne
>>
>> On 12/01/2022 11:46, bkil wrote:
>>> Good idea! Any way to mark whether it is just an opening (as on your
>>> picture with the castle ruins) or if it also contains transparent
>>> material (should be default)?
>>>
>>> What about elliptic windows? By the way, the word "rounded" sounds a
>>> bit vague, not sure whether it is a valid English term in
>>> architecture.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:28 PM Anne-Karoline Distel
>>> <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:
>>>> Hello and a happy new year!
>>>>
>>>> I'm proposing to standardize the use of window:shape in favour of similarly used window:type. Please find the proposal page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/window:shape.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to add shapes from your culture/ area, ideally with examples from Wikicommons. I have tried to be geographically diverse in the choice of photographs.
>>>>
>>>> Anne
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging