[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crossing:markings

[Mateusz Konieczny]

11 lip 2022, 10:07 od minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us:

> Somehow railroad crossings managed to escape the trap of shortsighted classification tagging. The rail regulators in my region classify level crossings on a linear scale. For example, the presence of flashing lights **of course** implies a bell, a saltire, and the requirement for the train to blow its horn. [5] But I see no problem in filling out a detailed form about crossing:saltire, crossing:bell, crossing:light, and crossing:horn. The extra checkboxes benefit regions where these fundamental laws of the universe do not hold. There can always be a preset for each common combination for mappers' convenience.
>

Yes, and crossing tagging should be decoupled into such separate tags.

Otherwise it will never solve of problems that in different regions different
things come in a different sets (zebra markings / traffic lights etc)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220711/db7f4dbb/attachment.htm>