[Tagging] Documenting entrance=shop

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Jun 5, 2022, 12:09 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

> On a side note, those 8800 entrance=exit seem quite silly, they would probably better be tagged as exit=yes and entrance=no
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/exit
>
or emergency=exit

though either way I am not sure is it worth changing tagging and I am definitely
not going to work on it

> entrance=no can mean different things by the way, it can mean there is an entrance but it is not usable (e.g. emergency exit), but it can also mean there is no entrance and no opening (avoidance of doubt, e.g. a former entrance which was bricked or a potential entrance which isn’t used, in both cases it may have a housenumber e.g. in Italy)
>
in cases where footway leads to a building geometry and there is node shared
by building and footway, I think that noexit=yes generally used to mark dead ends
is also OK (the same for road terminating in a building wall for some reason)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220605/4ebbd63a/attachment.htm>