[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - County, city and local highway networks in the United States

[stevea]

Outstanding it was unanimous!  Congratulations.

I have tweaked the California section text to match our statewide Route Relations wiki.  I do have a question about an update I made there [1] regarding our statewide Scenic (routes) network [2], even as I realize it is out-of-scope as to the proposal — er, I mean, now-Approved scheme:  as tagging network=US:CA is correct for a state highway, when that same highway is ALSO part of California's State Scenic Highway System, network=US:CA:Scenic collides with the existing network=* tag on the route=road relation.  Should a separate relation be created to contain this network=US:CA:Scenic tag identifying the route as part of this subnetwork?  Thanks for your good guidance.

Steve

[1] https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/California/State_Highway_Relations
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Scenic_Highway_System_(California)

> On Jun 8, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Clay Smalley <claysmalley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Voting has ended for tagging guidelines on county, city and local highway networks in the United States. The result was 17 votes for, 0 votes against, and 2 abstentions.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who participated and gave input.
> 
> See the proposal and discussion here:
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/County,_city_and_local_highway_networks_in_the_United_States