[Tagging] Tagging of larger shop types

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu May 5 10:42:17 UTC 2022


Am Do., 5. Mai 2022 um 11:09 Uhr schrieb Nathan Case <nathancase at outlook.com
>:

> I meant explicitly in the context of mapping the larger shop types where
> parts of the business might be entirely separate from the retail aspect
> (i.e. the shop).
>
> For example, where a car dealer (shop=car) has a large warehouse storing
> cars that aren't yet for display/sale. Or where a garden centre
> (shop=garden_centre) also has a private plant nursery where they grow
> plants which will be sold at a later date (once they've matured).
>
>

ok, I gues we are having different experiences locally. Around here, I have
never seen a car dealer who has a dedicated space for cars they won't sell
:)
I have less experience with plant nurseries, but typically, any business
will sell you everything, as long as both parties can agree on a price ;-)



> I would think in those cases, these should be mapped separately from the
> main shop area. But only if this is possible to define/know.
>


if we agree that shop=* should (ideally) only encompass public areas, then
it is completely fine. It would of course not automagically remove all the
private areas from the polygons tagged as shop, but it would be statement
how we think it _should_ be, and, if it was caught on by the mappers, would
lead in the long term to such a situation as defined desirable.



> Current practice should stand when we're talking about one shop = one
> building.
>
> Unless you think everything should also be included in the shop tag in
> such cases?
>
>

I do not understand what "everything" is referring to. Can you explain?

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220505/f354fb41/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list