[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Proposed Japan tagging/Places
gyotoku810
gyotoku810 at gmail.com
Fri May 27 05:35:53 UTC 2022
Dear all,
I'd like to share the results of recent discussions in the Japanese
community regarding place=region/borough/hamlet, which is not included
in the address system.
1. Exclusion of place=borough from the proposal
When we first proposed this idea, we thought that place=borough was "a
broad place name that spans multiple municipalities," but the tagging ML
pointed out that "borough" indicates a part of a municipality and
"region" is more preferable.
However, since place=region is currently used for the eight regions in
Japan, such as the Kanto region, it was difficult to use place=region
for other place names. Therefore, it was considered to use region:type=*
instead of place=borough to distinguish "broad place names that span
multiple municipalities".
It was also suggested that, in light of the OSM standard definition,
borough is associated with an administrative unit and is not suitable
for a rough designation of an wider area.
Considering these comments, I decided to remove the proposal for
place=borough from this proposal.
2. Change of proposal for place=hamlet
The OSM Wiki describes place=hamlet as "A smaller rural community,
typically with fewer than 100-200 inhabitants, and little
infrastructure.", and the English Wikipedia article Hamlet (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(place) ) has a similar explanation.
The "Koenji, Shibuya Hyakkendana, etc." used as an example in this
proposal was a local area name for a urban area which is clearly
different than that. Once I considered excluding place=hamlet from the
proposal as well as place=borough, but I found that there is a demand
for the tag to represent a hamlet name.
Therefore, place=hamlet is proposed as a tag for "A hamlet, or a
locally-used place name as an informal address" not associated with the
address system. The "locally-used place name" here is not the place name
as in the previous example "Koenji, Shibuya Hyakkendana, etc.", but a
place name where a common (maybe historical) name exists in addition to
the official name and is used as an unofficial address. This is similar
with a hamlet in its size and that it is not included in the address.
"Koenji, Shibuya Hyakken, etc." may be expressed as "place=region +
region:type=???" in the future.
3. Announcement
I modified these two points of the proposal, and also added and
corrected some English translations of the entire proposal. Please let
me know if you have any comments on these changes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Japan_tagging/Places
gyotoku810
More information about the Tagging
mailing list