[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by annekadistel at web.de:

>
> I also noticed that the > inscription>  key is used a lot where it should be > description> .      I think that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for historic      features. The > inscription>  field      only makes sense for memorials IMHO.
>
>
I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, amenity = drinking_water, man_made = signpost,
amenity = bicycle_parking

I see it also being validly used for many other objects.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221104/5705e7f0/attachment.htm>