[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

I'll offer a well-known example from my country:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign

It's on the US National Register of Historic Places which should qualify it
as a historic sign.  Although I suppose those in Europe would just consider
the sign to be a little old.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:56 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District
>
>
> Nov 4, 2022, 16:38 by annekadistel at web.de:
>
> I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are considered historic now.
> :P
> On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by annekadistel at web.de:
>
> I also noticed that the inscription key is used a lot where it should be
> description. I think that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for
> historic features. The inscription field only makes sense for memorials
> IMHO.
>
> I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, amenity = drinking_water,
> man_made = signpost,
>
>    - amenity = bicycle_parking
>    -
>    - I see it also being validly used for many other objects.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221104/0fc16f04/attachment.htm>