[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

[Peter Elderson]

I would say the lighting is slightly outdated.

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 4 nov. 2022 om 17:06 heeft Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> I'll offer a well-known example from my country:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign
> 
> It's on the US National Register of Historic Places which should qualify it as a historic sign.  Although I suppose those in Europe would just consider the sign to be a little old.
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:56 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District
>> 
>> 
>> Nov 4, 2022, 16:38 by annekadistel at web.de:
>> I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are considered historic now. :P
>> 
>> On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by annekadistel at web.de:
>>> I also noticed that the inscription key is used a lot where it should be description. I think that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for historic features. The inscription field only makes sense for memorials IMHO.
>>> 
>>> I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, amenity = drinking_water, man_made = signpost,
>>> amenity = bicycle_parking
>>> 
>>> I see it also being validly used for many other objects.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221104/63d67418/attachment-0001.htm>