[Tagging] Relations of type=site + tourism=camp_site

[Sven Geggus]

Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Yes, using site relation in addition to actual object breaks this rule
> and it is undesirable (and site relations in general are problematic).

Why do you think that "site relations in general are problematic"?

> Is there some reason why this camp sites cannot be mapped as areas
> if someone is doing such detailed mapping?

Of course there are. The thing is that objects outside (usually ways and
nodes) might be part of a particular camp_site. E.g. when a sport-center and
a camp_site are sharing there sanitary buildings.

I did not implement the support for this in OpenCampingMap just for fun. I
really do think that there is a need for this.

All the sites in the above changeset would need one or more additional
redundant tags like restaurant=yes on the main node or way if a site
relation is no longer an option.

Regards

Sven

-- 
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety (Benjamin Franklin)

/me is giggls at ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web