[Tagging] Relations of type=site + tourism=camp_site

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Nov 10, 2022, 21:21 by lists at fuchsschwanzdomain.de:

> Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com> wrote:
>
>> taking one random exemple :
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422
>> according to the parking name=*, the parking may be include in the 
>> tourism=site_camp
>>
>
> Yes but this is simply not as it is on the ground. The parking is not _part_
> of the camp-site but for visitors as well as the restaurant and shop. They
> are not stritly cusomers only like the enclosed area.
>
>> if someone think that the restaurant and the shop are also part of the 
>> camp site, then it's easy to extend the area to include those.
>>
>
> Which is just plain wrong as they are not _only_.
>
So
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422
site relation is including nearby restaurant and shop?

That are not actually part of camp site?

And just included there to manually do processing part of finding nearby
shops/restaurants?

In which way this shop/restaurant is part of being camp site except of being nearby?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221111/acf2cc5e/attachment.htm>