[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Nov 30 17:49:59 UTC 2022




30 lis 2022, 14:02 od dieterdreist at gmail.com:

> Am Mi., 30. Nov. 2022 um 01:10 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> >:
>
>>
>>
>> 29 lis 2022, 22:55 od >> dieterdreist at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sent from a phone
>>>
>>>> On 29 Nov 2022, at 09:02, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>>>> tagging at openstreetmap.org>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "no traffic signals" applies also only in some jurisdictions
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If there are traffic signals the crossing in OpenStreetMap gets tagged crossing=traffic_signals, this is regardless of jurisdiction AFAIK.
>>>
>> there are >38k crossing_ref=zebra in Poland
>> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1onT
>>
>
>
> yes, also here, I already wrote that the "crossing_ref" tag is about crossing markings and not about typology (around here, I know that the wiki may not be so clear on this). The "no traffic signals" was referring to crossing=zebra, not crossing_ref
>

also 19k+ crossing=zebra, see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1orm
example of one with traffic lights: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3586404853
(and not tagged with anything directly indicating that)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221130/a6fda4ae/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list