[Tagging] Better term for unisex

[martianfreeloader]

That's already in use in the same proposal.

gender=any - all genders allowed, unknown if there is segregation
gender=segregated - all genders allowed, genders segregated
gender=unisex - all genders allowed, no gender segregation

I was wondering if we can replace gender=unisex by something which has 
the same meaning. Currently, gender=mixed is used instead.


On 06/10/2022 00:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> gender=any?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Graeme
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 21:21, martianfreeloader 
> <martianfreeloader at posteo.net <mailto:martianfreeloader at posteo.net>> wrote:
> 
>     In the discussion of the Gender proposal, I noted that I find it
>     strange
>     to use the term "unisex" for "gender-neutral" or "all-gender" (as sex
>     and gender are different properties).
> 
>     Proposal:
>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender
>     <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender>
> 
>     My suggestion was to use gender=mixed instead of gender=unisex.
>     However,
>     the question was raised whether the meaning of gender=mixed is still
>     easily understood if the feature can only be used by one person at the
>     time. I think the answer is yes. But if people disagree, it would be
>     great if they raise their concerns before voting starts.
> 
>     Any comments?
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging