[Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

[martianfreeloader]

I've briefly screened the wiki for voting and couldn't find anything on 
that matter.

I'll revert my vote, sorry.

Anne, as commented in my original vote, I really appreciate your work on 
this. But let's try to get this done in the proper order to avoid future 
conflicts.

By the way: I've raised the exact same concern in the Citadel Proposal, 
but only the proposal author seemed to notice:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Citadel


On 07/10/2022 11:06, stevea wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2022, at 1:47 AM, Nathan Case <nathancase at outlook.com> wrote:
>> If it's not appropriate then we end up in the situation where parent keys aren't approved but child keys/values are - which seems a little odd.
> 
> This is a remarkably astute observation (thanks, Nathan!) and raises darn good questions.  I agree it is odd and I wouldn’t like to see this become a trend.
> 
> Anne, I don’t think you meant to “back-door” such “lesser status” tags into OSM, I don’t attribute any nefariousness on your part, as these are somewhat-subtle (yet still important) issues.
> 
> martianfreeloader, while I’ve never done it and it would be unusual, I believe we are allowed to change our vote right up until the “closing of voting” period. I wouldn’t encourage this behavior, as it can be seen as manipulative, but an “honest overlook” like you’ve outlined here seems OK to me.  If other or some rule somewhere I’ve missed / am unaware of contradicts me, I’ll happily make it MY turn to redact my “seems OK to me.”  (I believe I have seen votes go from approve / oppose to abstain, but I’d have to check, and it’s still pretty rare).
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging