[Tagging] Better term for unisex
martianfreeloader
martianfreeloader at posteo.net
Mon Oct 10 18:53:14 UTC 2022
Hi Amanda,
No.
What puzzles non-native speakers (including myself) is that English has
a clear distinction between sex and gender (other than, for example,
German). Yet, the term "unisex" (contains the word "sex") is used to
designate a situation in the "gender" category, not sex.
Can you help?
On 10/10/2022 19:37, Amanda McCann wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 20:05 +02:00, Zeke Farwell <ezekielf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The proposal currently states:
>>> Meaning of the unisex <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unisex>=yes is currently unclear:
>>>
>>> * gender neutral facility (as the "unisex" term in English); or
>>> * facility that accessible for men and women, either segregated or not.
>> I do not understand what is unclear. The term unisex is well
>> understood among English speakers to mean "gender neutral".
>
> I'm a native English speaker, and I agree! I also wrote that part of the wiki (years ago). I think some non-native speakers treated `unisex=yes` as meaning “gender segregated but male & female are available”, i.e. read that paragraph as “some OSMers might have been wrong, and we don't know how many unisex=yes/no tags in OSM were affected by the misunderstanding”
>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list