[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Oct 11 14:13:39 UTC 2022




Oct 11, 2022, 15:39 by marc_marc at mailo.com:

> Le 11.10.22 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>
>> I see no value in approving de facto key.
>>
>> Maybe there would be value in deapproving historic=battlefield
>>
>> Also, is "are of historic interest" mismatches how
>> historic=wayside_shrine
>> historic=memorial
>> many historic=wayside_cross
>> are used.
>>
>
> so the value to approved a facto key is "don't approve
> those problematic keys"
>
> but imho a memorial "are of historic interest" for sure !
>
many, but not all

for example my city has political memorial  (not that I disagree with politics here)
dedicated to victims of notoriously poor air quality

I have seen public memorials that someone setup as memorial to
some person or even their pet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221011/9945f311/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list