[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

[Mateusz Konieczny]

No, as long as meaning is not being changed.

Oct 11, 2022, 15:29 by martianfreeloader at posteo.net:

> Thanks. Do you see a problem with approving a de facto key?
>
>
>
> On 11/10/2022 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> I see no value in approving de facto key.
>>
>> Maybe there would be value in deapproving historic=battlefield
>>
>> Also, is "are of historic interest" mismatches how
>> historic=wayside_shrine
>> historic=memorial
>> many historic=wayside_cross
>> are used.
>>
>> Oct 11, 2022, 15:15 by martianfreeloader at posteo.net:
>>
>>  Hello.
>>
>>  I’m proposing to approve the historic=* key together with a number
>>  of tags:
>>
>>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic
>>
>>  historic=* is in widespread use and currently documented as de facto.
>>
>>  Please comment wherever you feel most comfortable:
>>  - Here
>>  - On the wiki talk page
>>  - In the forum
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221011/1d0deb58/attachment-0001.htm>