[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 02:36:21 UTC 2022


On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 23:28, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
> Maybe there would be value in deapproving historic=battlefield
>

I would love to be able to move the vast majority of military= to
historic=military, as they are no longer military installations.

Yes, they certainly were, but they aren't any more.

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 00:07, Peter Neale via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Many ruins and memorials are "of historic interest" it is true, but that
> could be tagged as a property ("historic=yes") of the object
> "man_made=<object_name>" .
>

That could also be an option, but would that stop them rendering as current
military features?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221012/714d6ea1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list