[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 11 Oct 2022, at 17:32, martianfreeloader <martianfreeloader at posteo.net> wrote:
> 
> Nobody commented during RFC and then everybody voted against; which is not nice. I was one of them.


particularly because the no vote didn’t offer any meaningful contribution, the only reason given was a formality (because the “historic” key is not formally approved). 


> 
> I'm happy to hand over the historic proposal to maintained by someone else! Anyone interested?


we do not need the historic key to be “approved”, it is already there, any definition we put in the wiki should reflect how the tags are actually used. Approving a definition that would make current tagging an “error” if it is completely introduced with many established and undisputed values, is just wasting everybody’s time, even more if the result would lead to “deprecation” of these established tags https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#values

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221012/24dcdfd0/attachment.htm>