[Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for fountain=*

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 13 Oct 2022, at 18:25, Davidoskky via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 
> It is an old fountain, maybe 100/200 years old, but I don't see how that could be defined as historic since it has no historic importance, it's just an old fountain.
> 

maybe I am using the word historic incorrectly or it has several meanings, there is no requirement for “historic importance” in the meaning I intended. If you prefer the word “old”, I can live with this, although old could apply to things that are much younger than those where historic applies. Something from a few years ago could be old, not likely historic (maybe in the computer industry).


> I don't think it is decorative, it's a fountain in a small village which was probably used to refresh people, get water for cleaning and watering plants.
> 


It seems we are seeing different things, I can’t help if you cannot recognize that the fountain is clearly decorated. It is not just an utility, the wall is a part, isn’t it?

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221013/c2f0725b/attachment.htm>