[Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for fountain=*
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 10:19:57 UTC 2022
Am Fr., 14. Okt. 2022 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
> This other fountain doesn't have such wall, thus it is not decorative
> and it cannot be tagged as amenity=fountain (assuming we disregard the
> recreational utility mentioned in the wiki).
>
>
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Water_fountain_with_water_basin_near_Santiago_de_Compostela.jpg
>
>
this other fountain happens to be decorated as well. Let's ignore this for
a moment, and assume it wasn't. It could still be a decorative fountain, if
it can be seen as street decor. Setting up a fountain requires some effort,
so there will usually be a purpose, even if it isn't necessary now as it
was when it was constructed. I would generally see amenity=fountain
applicable for any fountain that is not only a drinking fountain and that
is not set up as a watering place for animals only.
> The shape and use of these two fountains looks the same to me.
> Why would you tag them as different features?
>
I wouldn't
>
> I'm not necessarily saying they need to be tagged as amenity=fountain,
> but I would expect their main tagging to be the same and maybe differ in
> some secondary parameter.
maybe, if you come up with an idea about these secondary parameters, we can
discuss them.
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221014/e8e386b1/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list