[Tagging] improve the proposal procedure

[Peter Elderson]

I agree that it got a little out of hand, but there were some good
proposals and votes as well.
Proposing and voting should not be hard, so you always get some lesser
quality stuff.

Let's not throw away the baby with the wash water.

 Peter Elderson


Op do 20 okt. 2022 om 14:28 schreef Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com>:

> Hello,
>
> the past few weeks have been stormy for proposals:
> - people opening 4 or more RFCs to collect opinions
> - RFCs or votes that open and close in less than 12 hours
> - Proposals that go to vote on the 14th day, even though
> this is the minimum time limit and the problems in progress
> have sometimes not been resolved.
> - nominees to make even more simultaneous proposals
> without showing that it is just one person
>
> How could we improve this ?
> - limit to 1 simultaneous proposal per person?
> - limit this to active contributor status in the osmf sense?
> - encourage the use of the "resolved" tag in the talk page
> to see visually if the points have been addressed or not?
> - improve the wording for the 14 day minimum time limit which
> is too often understood lately as "pfff 14 days to wait" ?
> - limit the scope of proposal ?
> - any other ideas?
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221020/71c36b9e/attachment.htm>