[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

What is the use of the proposal process then?

Anne

On 22/10/2022 14:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 22 Oct 2022, at 12:47, Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:
>>
>> Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the concern about
>> the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose to change the key
>> from site_type to archaeological_type
>
> such a retagging would be a waste of time, I would not pursue this idea, and given the high majority that is required nowadays it is also unlikely to succeed.
>
> You could just continue mapping the settlement sites and crannogs as you please and have a wonderful time, document the tags, speak about it so that other people interested in mapping this kind of feature can join you. :-)
>
> Cheers Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging