[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Oct 22, 2022, 15:09 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 22 Oct 2022, at 12:47, Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:
>>
>> Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the concern about
>> the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose to change the key
>> from site_type to archaeological_type
>>
>
>
> such a retagging would be a waste of time, I would not pursue this idea, and given the high majority that is required nowadays it is also unlikely to succeed.
>
> You could just continue mapping the settlement sites and crannogs as you please and have a wonderful time, document the tags, speak about it so that other people interested in mapping this kind of feature can join you. :-)
>
personally it seems to me that it has chance of being a good idea

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221023/310ddd8e/attachment-0001.htm>