[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

[Warin]

On 24/10/22 07:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>
>
> Oct 22, 2022, 15:09 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
>
>
>
>     sent from a phone
>
>         On 22 Oct 2022, at 12:47, Anne-Karoline Distel
>         <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:
>
>         Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the
>         concern about
>         the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose to change
>         the key
>         from site_type to archaeological_type
>
>
>
>     such a retagging would be a waste of time, I would not pursue this
>     idea, and given the high majority that is required nowadays it is
>     also unlikely to succeed.
>
>     You could just continue mapping the settlement sites and crannogs
>     as you please and have a wonderful time, document the tags, speak
>     about it so that other people interested in mapping this kind of
>     feature can join you. :-)
>
> personally it seems to me that it has chance of being a good idea
>

+1


It can coexist with past tags ...

Migration can then proceed;

A mechanical edit can be done to add the new tags.  (normal approval 
process)

After some time of use, the older tags can be removed .. (normal 
approval process)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221024/f441e1ba/attachment.htm>