[Tagging] RFC: Removal of Eruvs from OSM, and further boundry=religious

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 6 Sep 2022, at 09:37, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> 
> 
> [Very OT]
> 
> People could simply filter out boundaries for display purposes -right now-. One problem with that is not that it doesn't work, but that it creates magical links between visible and invisible objects. Doing away with shared geometries/nodes as Jochen proposes would/could make that aspect of the issue go away. 
> 


this is assuming that all boundaries are defined through coordinates, but when they are defined through features (textual descriptions) it would be better to have this connection in OpenStreetMap as well. E.g. a nature reserve begins on the right side of a river, when we refine the river geometry we would want the boundary to follow suit.

Cheers Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220906/18554fa8/attachment.htm>