[Tagging] RFC: Removal of Eruvs from OSM, and further boundry=religious

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 9/5/22 22:24, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
>     is there agreement that something physical needs to be there for a
>     religious boundary to be mapped
> 
> Of course there isn't agreement.  Like anything else on the project, 
> reasonable people disagree on the topic of what belongs in the map.

Then maybe the fact that some/all Eruvs have an actual observable 
physical boundary is irrelevant becasue even if they did not, people 
would argue for keeping them in OSM?

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"