[Tagging] fix the suggestion for replacement for pipeline=marker into marker=* + subject=pipeline ?

[François Lacombe]

Dear all,

A proposal has started on a related topic about markers:
administrative/forestry limits
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Boundary_markers_proposal

It would be good to merge our views here about subject=* and pipelines into
this as to not make any particularism.

Introducing marking=* could solve many issues objected here.

Best regards

François

Le jeu. 1 sept. 2022 à 00:18, Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com> a écrit :

> Hello,
>
> Le 31.08.22 à 23:28, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
> > I still have no idea how to mark pipeline marker
>
> that is precisely my question !
> you see a marker ? -> marker=yes, ok
> you understand it's about a pipeline ? ->  witch tag ?
>
> To tag the subject of an artistic work, we currently
> use subject=* which is why I thought it was relevant
> to use this key to also fill in what a marker is about.
> I'm open to any better tag (that's the goal of my message)
> but having one key per subject isn't a good idea.
>
> > in case where I am not sure about its contents.
>
> nobody object that the current fix remplacement listed
> in the depreciated features "marker=* + utility=" need
> to be improved and that utility isn't mandatory to mark
> a pipeline marker.
> I was thinking of making the change at the end of the conversation.
> if you loop on the current state of the wiki, i'll make
> the change now and change it again if a better idea comes up.
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220907/2e1df49c/attachment.htm>