[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

I could have just gone and used it and not made a proposal, but I don't
feel very comfortable making videos about tags that are just "in use"
(mostly by me) and not approved. It's a risky strategy, but I hope it'll
pay off for this one, because there are at least two videos in it. it
also delays the video production by at least four weeks into the rainy
season...

But I would also like to re-tag the ringforts from fortification_type to
settlement_type, because they are not military. That's for the next
proposal, though.

Anne

On 22/09/2022 20:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 22 Sep 2022, at 18:06, Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadistel at web.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Following that swiftly with a new proposal:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog
>
>
> at first I thought that’s quite a specific value for such an
> apparently generic term like settlement type, but likely it will be
> easier to get specific settlement types, e.g. from information boards
> on site, as it will be to come to a global level of generalized types.
> Many of the specific types are probably occurring only within regions
> and smaller areas, and this is part of why it’s interesting, and there
> the specific type is what you’d want to know.
>
> I’d support the tag although probably not use this specific value  :)
>
> Cheers Martin
>
> PS: following wikidata I came to a redirect in the 19th century
> encyclopedia, a printed redirect, funny how such concepts have been
> there already for a long time:
> https://de.m.wikisource.org/wiki/MKL1888:Crannoges
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220922/02b5d697/attachment.htm>