[Tagging] incline=up_and_down

[Brad Haack]

Any good cycling router needs to use a digital elevation model in it's 
algorithm, or use elevation tied to the paths somehow (such as with a 
gpx track).   These odd OSM tags are a sideshow.


On 9/26/22 03:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>
>
> 26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od osm at tobias-knerr.de:
>
>     On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>         But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but
>         path goes through series of up and down hops?
>
>
>     I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the
>     presence of "hops" into a specialized tag instead of making the
>     value space of an established and approved key more messy.
>
>     Leave incline=* to describe the overall incline of the way in that
>     case. That is: Do you end up lower or higher than you were in the
>     start?
>
> In this case I am thinking about something
> that overall has tiny elevation change.
>
> What would you propose as such extra tag?
>
> up_and_down=yes
>
> (not really happy about it, but right now I
> have no better idea)?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220926/2a8734c4/attachment.htm>