[Tagging] Use of crossing:island where crossings and islands are mapped separately

[martianfreeloader]

I support crossing:island=separate.

It is unambiguous and in analogy to a lot of other taggings like sidewalks.



On 27/09/2022 09:49, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sep 27, 2022, 08:42 by rob at hubris.org.uk:
> 
>     Where there is a crossing with traffic islands, but the highways
>     forming the crossings and crossing the islands are mapped
>     separately, my assumption has been that crossing:island=no is the
>     correct tagging.
> 
> What "crossing:island" means exactly?
> - "this crossing has associated island"
> - "in addition to mapped geometry there is also a traffic island on this 
> crossing"
> 
> If the second, then what about crossing:island=separate?
> 
> crossing:island=no seems a bit confusing to be used where crossing 
> island exists.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging