[Tagging] Is tagging of fuel: assumed to be exhaustive?

[Marc_marc]

Le 18.04.23 à 16:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
> Is tagging of fuel: assumed to be exhaustive?

no, some contributors will fill in what they are interested in,
others will fill in everything that is visible (and may not
be able to see the blue additive pump not visible from the car pumps), 
others will do an exaustive survey

> For example amenity=fuel + fuel:octane_80=yes
> 
> Is it implying that it is sole type of fuel available?

no

> Is it possible to mark that fuel station
> has solely fuel:octane_98 and fuel:octane_80 ?
> It seems that fuel:others=no is used a bit for that purpose

yes *:others=no but also *:*=only exist for that purpose