[Tagging] Is tagging of fuel: assumed to be exhaustive?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Apr 18, 2023, 17:12 by marc_marc at mailo.com:

> Le 18.04.23 à 16:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>
>> Is tagging of fuel: assumed to be exhaustive?
>>
>
> no, some contributors will fill in what they are interested in,
> others will fill in everything that is visible (and may not
> be able to see the blue additive pump not visible from the car pumps), others will do an exaustive survey
>
>> For example amenity=fuel + fuel:octane_80=yes
>>
>> Is it implying that it is sole type of fuel available?
>>
>
> no
>
Great, I will note it at relevant wiki page unless someone will protest.

>> Is it possible to mark that fuel station
>> has solely fuel:octane_98 and fuel:octane_80 ?
>> It seems that fuel:others=no is used a bit for that purpose
>>
>
> yes *:others=no but also *:*=only exist for that purpose
>
=only works only when you have station offering single fuel, right?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230418/56a5c277/attachment.htm>