[Tagging] Is tagging of fuel: assumed to be exhaustive?

Marc_marc marc_marc at mailo.com
Wed Apr 19 22:47:21 UTC 2023


Le 19.04.23 à 14:19, Matija Nalis a écrit :
> I think that my point remains that:
> - one method is clear and unambiguous ("fuel:lpg=no")
> - one method is not clear / is ambiguous ("fuel=octane_98;diesel").
> 
> So the first one should be preferred. Does that make sense?

- one is a nightmare for datause
- one isn't a nightmare for datause
So the 2nd one should be preferred. Does that make sense?





More information about the Tagging mailing list