[Tagging] Fwd: Combining "locked=yes" with various access tags

[Zeev Stadler]

Here is my summary of the discussion so far:

This tagging combination example was shown by several people to be
appropriate for the "state on the ground" of certain barrier structures.
Therefore the question of the appropriate interpretation is a valid
question.

My interpretation was generally accepted:

   1. As far as the general public, the allowed access for various
   transportation modes is not affected by a "lock" tag:
   - A "locked=yes" tag does not restrict transportation modes with allowed
      access such as "yes" and "permissive"
      - A "locked=no" tag does not allow access for otherwise-disallowed
      transportation modes such as "no" and "private"
   2. The locked tag should be considered by routing software only when
   used for an "emergency routing" mode. In such a mode, a "locked=no" tag may
   be used to allow access for otherwise-disallowed transportation modes.

I would appreciate the help of the tagging list in improving the phrasing
of my interpretation in order to update the "Key:locked" wiki page soon.

Zeev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230222/5a90614e/attachment.htm>