[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

[Peter Elderson]

Voting is about formal acceptance of the de facto usage.
I do not expect any no's, but maybe someone was against the tag al these
years and now finally gets the chance to say no.
A fail will not change anything to the de facto usage.

If a bunch of no votes appear, I will simply cancel my proposal. But I
trust it'll pass. So far, no criticism on the mapping itself has been
posted.

(If I had tried the same with landcover=trees|grass.... don't worry, I
won't)

Peter Elderson


Op vr 24 feb. 2023 om 11:51 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> Am Fr., 24. Feb. 2023 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson <
> pelderson at gmail.com>:
>
>> Sorry, I wasn't clear. The current status of the tag is de facto (was: in
>> use, but someone, not me, amended that).  The proposal intends to alter
>> that from de facto to approved, by voting.
>>
>> Fr gr Peter Elderson
>>
>
>
> are you going to change the definition with the vote? Let's imagine you
> start a voting for the exact same text as is now on the tag definition
> page.
> If it wins it will change the tag status from "de-facto" to "approved". If
> it fails, will it change the tag status from "de-facto" to what? Strictly,
> voting is about a proposal, not about "tags" (it is about the
> definition/meaning that should be associated to the tags).
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230224/b8c9fb42/attachment.htm>