[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Feb 25 18:09:43 UTC 2023




Feb 21, 2023, 12:30 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:

>
>
>
> On 19/2/23 06:00, Mateusz Konieczny via      Tagging wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Feb 17, 2023, 11:03 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/2/23 21:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging          wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Feb 16, 2023, 10:18 by >>>> 61sundowner at gmail.com>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> landuse=meadow should delete the vegetation in the              description leaving the use ... "Used to tag an area of              land used for hay (meadow) or for grazing animals              (pasture)." That would make it clear and possibly reduce              its misuse. If you can only see grass then you don't know              if it is a meadow, so don't map that .. but map the grass!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> note that barn storing hay is not            landuse=meadow and according to 
>>>> "land used for hay (meadow)" maybe interpreted            in way claiming this.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That problem already exists with the present description, so          no change there. 
>>>
>>>
>> It does not exist:
>>
>> "An area of meadow or pasture: land primarily        vegetated by grass
>> and other non-woody plants, mainly used for hay or        grazing."
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> Arr I see your point (finally) .. How is this?
>
>
> "Used to tag an area of land used to produce hay (a meadow) or      for grazing animals (a pasture)."
>
>
seems to work for me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230225/f2644418/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list