[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Feb 25 18:09:43 UTC 2023
Feb 21, 2023, 12:30 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:
>
>
>
> On 19/2/23 06:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Feb 17, 2023, 11:03 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/2/23 21:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Feb 16, 2023, 10:18 by >>>> 61sundowner at gmail.com>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> landuse=meadow should delete the vegetation in the description leaving the use ... "Used to tag an area of land used for hay (meadow) or for grazing animals (pasture)." That would make it clear and possibly reduce its misuse. If you can only see grass then you don't know if it is a meadow, so don't map that .. but map the grass!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> note that barn storing hay is not landuse=meadow and according to
>>>> "land used for hay (meadow)" maybe interpreted in way claiming this.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That problem already exists with the present description, so no change there.
>>>
>>>
>> It does not exist:
>>
>> "An area of meadow or pasture: land primarily vegetated by grass
>> and other non-woody plants, mainly used for hay or grazing."
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> Arr I see your point (finally) .. How is this?
>
>
> "Used to tag an area of land used to produce hay (a meadow) or for grazing animals (a pasture)."
>
>
seems to work for me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230225/f2644418/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list