[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - High seas

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 22:00:50 UTC 2023


Would this get around the problem of sea / oceans not being named e.g.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-28.0675&lon=153.4939#map=14/-28.0666/153.4835
, is part of the Coral Sea section of the Pacific Ocean, but comes up as
nothing found.

Thanks

Graeme


On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 12:58, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> A proposal[1] to recommend the tagging of oceanic seas as nodes rather
> than areas is now open for comments.
>
> This proposal follows a community forum discussion[2] regarding the
> modeling of the Gulf of Mexico as a node rather than as a crude polygon.
> This change was made in [3]. This proposal would codify the practice of
> tagging seas as a node as a general practice.
>
> If approved, this proposal would create a recommendation that mappers not
> create complex "beast" mega polygons on top of the ocean (outside the
> coastline), such as the 5,400+ member Gulf of Saint Lawrence [4], as this
> practice is unnecessary for labeling.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/High_seas
> [2]
> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-mexico-object-rendering-of-large-seas
> [3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130767988
> [4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9428957
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230103/ba86cfb5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list