[Tagging] duplicate road routes one named the other referenced

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Jun 12 10:29:27 UTC 2023


Hi,

I came across a duplicate of a road route.


Both have the same number of members.

One has the name, the other has the reference.

I delete one placing the relevant tags on the other.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/540719

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/540719https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3081392/history


Question:

Is there a reason why 2 road route relations are required - one for the 
name the other for the ref???

Note the duplicate was created some 10 years ago ..  there may have been 
a rendering issue back then...


I did look on tag info and ~ 90% had name and ~ 75% had references .. so 
both name and ref must be used on some of these routes in OSM.

  I checked another main road nearby ,,, and came up with a similar but 
more complex situation.


The name Hume Highway is on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2103184 no ref tag. (entire 
length covered)

The name 'Hume Highway (northbound)' is on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9436122 (south of Albury)


The reference is on;


https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14879845 (north of Albury)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2103183 (north of Albury) .. 
could be a duplicate of the above

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/240718 (south of Albury)


I'd have to look harder for more infor on the Hume Hwy situation. But 
the Snowy Mountains Highway is fairly clear cut.







More information about the Tagging mailing list