[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Mar 30 15:06:04 UTC 2023
Mar 30, 2023, 16:11 by marc_marc at mailo.com:
> Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit :
>
>> we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump.
>>
>
> in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed
> to designate all the pumps in the same location.
>
> it you really want to have an amenity to keep
> the same idea as for fossil amenity,
> why not amenity=charing_place
> but keep the current in-use meaning amenity=charging_station inchanged
>
that would be far worse: break many data consumers and require retagging far more cases
And would also redefine amenity=charging_station anyway
>> And it also seems logical to use "man_made" category to tag the individual charge points as we do for fuel pumps.
>>
>
> that doesn't answer my objection: don't change the meaning
> of an existing tag :
> For years we will end up with a tag with two meanings: the old and
> the new and it will be impossible to review the old tag since part
> of the new meaning (amenity=charging_station = a site of man_made=charging_station) uses the same tag as the current meaning (amenity=charging_station = a charging station, that may be part of
> a bigger site)
> not being able to migrate from the old to the new schema is the worst thing you can do to destroy data quality
>
It is sufficient to review all cases with amenity=charging_station next to each other,
which is doable and only tiny amount of cases will require on the ground checks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230330/d5a92751/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list