[Tagging] Tagging for the renderer : One-way "flow" bicycle tracks
Volker Schmidt
voschix at gmail.com
Mon Sep 11 06:15:37 UTC 2023
The problem is that we frequently have cycleways or food-cycle-ways that
are legally oneway for cyclists, but not for pedestrians. They are tagged
"oneway=yes". I agree we need a oneway tag for pedestrians, but it cannot
be a simple oneway=yes because that is already in use with a different
meaning, i.e. "oneway for vehicles".
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, 08:03 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging, <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sep 10, 2023, 23:37 by graemefitz1 at gmail.com:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 01:25, Niels Elgaard Larsen <elgaard at agol.dk>
> wrote:
>
> Volker Schmidt:
> > Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not
> for pedestrians.
>
>
> We do have a lot of highway=footway,oneway=yes
>
>
> Also know of suspended Tree Walk walkways e.g.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-28.23281/153.13822 which are
> signposted as oneway, & tagged the same
>
> And there are oneway hiking trails where it is a legal restriction.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230911/9aea51d1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list