[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - lifecycle prefix vandalised:

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 17 Sep 2023, at 14:12, Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com> wrote:
> 
> If you're not there at the precise moment of the change of state,
> the only thing you can see is that the bench is no longer there
> or isn't in a working state anymore


maybe, but there might be other ways to learn how it was damaged, someone could tell you, or the type of damage indicates it was vandalized.


> 2 "past" lifecycles seems sufficient to me (was: for when there's nothing left, damaged or equivalent for when there's something non-functional)


was: can also be used for non-physical features (indeed most usage is with was:amenity) it doesn’t imply there is nothing left at all. There are already a lot of prefixes for similar lifecycle states, e.g. demolished, razed, destroyed, abandoned, ruins, from this point of view, “vandalized” would be one more, adding another nuance.