[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - lifecycle prefix vandalised:

[Mark Wagner]

On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:59:27 +0100
Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadistel at web.de> wrote:

> I thought that using photographic examples in the proposal would make
> it fairly clear, but apparently not.
> 
> If you come to a bench that is no longer there, "vandalised:" would
> not apply. If the seats are damaged to an extend that you cannot sit
> on it any longer, then it would. There is hope that the local
> authorities or whoever puts up benches will fix it eventually, hence
> the "temporarily out of order" in the infobox.

While hiking, I come across a guidepost that's been sheared off two
feet above the ground.  Was it accidentally hit by a snowplow (thus,
"destroyed:"), or was it deliberately pulled over by a snowmobiler
(thus, "vandalized:")?

-- 
Mark