[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - lifecycle prefix vandalised:

[Yves]

I'm not that much in favour of such a tag:
1) it's not about the current state of the element, but more on the cause of it.
2) It's temporary (hopefully)

Yves

Le 17 septembre 2023 12:50:21 GMT+02:00, Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadistel at web.de> a écrit :
>I'm proposing to establish the lifecycle prefix "vandalised:" which has
>been in use for at least 8 years in some form, but hasn't been documented.
>
>This was triggered by noticing this one:
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11196545305 (unfortunately, I didn't
>take a photo).
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Vandalised:
>
>I'm not active in the forum, so if anyone wants to let people know
>there, that'd be fabulous.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Anne
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230917/9e031147/attachment.htm>